Lawmakers in various US states are directing their focus towards AI, grappling with the intricacies of this rapidly evolving technology. Connecticut is taking a leading role by creating an inventory of all government AI systems and making this information accessible to the public. They also intend to regularly review these systems to prevent any unlawful bias. State Senator James Maroney of Connecticut, an influential figure in the AI domain, intends to collaborate with counterparts from states like Colorado, New York, Virginia, Minnesota, and more to establish a model AI framework. This framework would include measures such as product liability rules and mandatory assessments to gauge the impact of AI systems.

Around 25 states, along with Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, have introduced similar bills relating to AI, with 14 states and Puerto Rico already implementing resolutions or legislation to address AI-related concerns. Many states are in the process of forming advisory groups and committees to explore the influence of AI on state activities and policies. Their primary emphasis has been on overseeing AI applications within their respective state governments before enacting limitations on private sector use. These legislators are striving to find a middle ground between shielding citizens from discrimination and potential harm, while also promoting advancements in fields like healthcare, science, business, and education.

Why does this matter?

Regulating AI is high on the agenda of national states. Discussions surrounding the governance of AI revolve around whether the issues stemming from AI, such as safety, privacy, and ethics, necessitate entirely new legal and regulatory structures, or if current ones could be modified to encompass AI-related concerns. Initially, the prevailing notion was that adapting existing regulations was the appropriate course of action. However, with the rapid advancement of AI and its widespread applications, specialized regulatory efforts tailored to AI began to surface on global, regional, and national scales.

Although the European Union has taken a leading role in AI regulation, some U.S. legislators argue that federal action is necessary. Nevertheless, state legislatures are stepping in due to the rapid pace of AI advancement. The proposed bills differ widely, ranging from defining the concept of personhood in North Dakota to placing restrictions on AI's role in hiring decisions in New York. Lawmakers are eager to both comprehend and manage AI deployment within their jurisdictions, all while nurturing innovation and accountability.